1. Bought from Lai Yuan and Company 來遠公司, New York. For price, see Original Miscellaneous List, p. 189. $310.
2. (Undated Folder Sheet note) Original attribution: Chinese. "Ancient." See further, S.I. 875, Appendix VII (see Paragraph 7).
3. (Carl Whiting Bishop, 1922) See Berthold Laufer, Jade: A Study in Chinese Archaeology and Religion (Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History, 1912), p. 102, fig. 35, and p. 95, fig. 29.
4. (Archibald Gibson Wenley, 1945) Shang 商 dynasty.
5. (Archibald Gibson Wenley, 1945) This implement seems to reflect some earlier specialized agricultural tool form. It was probably laterally hafted (see folder F1916.492), and bound to the haft by thongs passing through the hole in the tang, under the haft on both sides of the blade, and over the chock like lateral projections. The jade form is of course ceremonial, and may be a badge of office or a ritualistic implement used in some ceremony reflecting an agricultural rite or practice.
6. (Undated Folder Sheet note) Sp. G. is 2.930.
7. (H. Elise Buckman, 1964) The Envelope File contained no further information, and has now been destroyed.
8. (Thomas Lawton, 1978) Late Shang 商 Early Western Chou [Zhou] 周.
9. (Julia K. Murray, 1982) Chang [Zhang] 璋 F1916.162 is a thin example of the typical chang [zhang] 璋 (see Folder Sheet F1916.492). There is an incised design consisting of parallel lines running across the surface between the two projections near the hole. The hole was bored from one side of the slab. Two features not found on the typical chang [zhang] 璋 are the sharpening of the upper part of one side, and the thinness of this side compared to the one opposite. The prominent slice marks running in lengthwise direction suggest that someone tried to make the chang [zhang] 璋 thinner. The texture of the surface is somewhat "dry," rather than smooth and sleek like most of the others in the collection.
10. (Stephen Allee per Keith Wilson, March 31, 2008) On this date entered: Period One (Late Neolithic period), Date (ca. 2500--2000 BCE), Artist (Qijia 齊家 culture), Title, Object name, Geographical region (Northwest China); plus Description per Jenny F. So and Dimensions per Christine Lee, from Jade Project Database.
11. (Jeffrey Smith per Keith Wilson, July 17, 2008) Ceremonial object added as secondary classification.
12. (Stephen Allee, March 23, 2009) Added designation "nephrite" to Medium as per Janet Douglas using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (January 8, 2009).
13. (Susan Kitsoulis per Keith Wilson, June 9, 2010) Changed culture from "Qija 齊家 culture" to "Longshan 龍山 culture (ca. 3000--1700 BCE)"; changed "Northwest China" to "China"; date from "(ca. 2500--2000 BCE)" to "(ca. 2000--1700 BCE)."
14. (Jeffrey Smith per Keith Wilson, March 21, 2016) Undated curatorial remark: (Jenny F. So, Jade Project Database) Light and dark olive gray "puddingstone." Very thin; one face flat, other slightly convex. Conical hole drilled from flat face? Asymmetrically curved top; one upper edge honed (modern?). One blunt notch on either edge at bottom of blade, just before rectangular, perforated tang. Slice mark running lengthwise on dull, unpolished face; other face polished. Thin incised lines just above notches suspicious (modern addition?).
The information presented on this website may be revised and updated at any time as ongoing research progresses or as otherwise warranted. Pending any such revisions and updates, information on this site may be incomplete or inaccurate or may contain typographical errors. Neither the Smithsonian nor its regents, officers, employees, or agents make any representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the information on the site. Use this site and the information provided on it subject to your own judgment. The National Museum of Asian Art welcomes information that would augment or clarify the ownership history of objects in their collections..