1. (Jeffrey Smith per Keith Wilson, July 8, 2008) Ceremonial object added as secondary classification.
2. (Najiba Choudhury per Keith Wilson, August 15, 2017) Title changed from "Disk (bi), fragment, reworked to make an axehead (fu)" to "Axe (yue 鉞), probably reworked from a collared disk"; period one changed from "Erlitou culture or early Shang dynasty" to "Late Shang dynasty"; period two added "Anyang period"; date changed from "ca. 2000-1300 BCE" to "ca. 1300-ca. 1050 BCE"; geography changed from "China" to "China, probably Henan province, Anyang"; and medium changed from "Jade" to "Jade (nephrite)".
3. (Najiba Choudhury per Keith Wilson, January 28, 2019) Added Chinese translation by Jingmin Zhang; and moved unpublished research by Louis Fitzgerald Huber from curatorial remarks to the text entry field.
4. (Jeffrey Smith per Keith Wilson, April 2, 2020) Erlitou culture removed as Constituent.
5. (YinYing Chen per Keith Wilson, February 22, 2023)
Change title from "Axe (yue 鉞), probably reworked from a collared disk" to "Axe, probably reworked from a collared disk."
Change date from "ca. 1300-ca. 1050 BCE" to "ca. 1250-ca. 1050 BCE."
Change date from "公元前1300-1050年" to "公元前1250-1050年" in the translation field.
Draft catalogue entry (no. 95) for S2012.9.269 for the catalogue of the Singer collection (1970--90); by Louisa Fitzgerald Huber
Axe
Shang 商 dynasty, 13th--12th century BCE
Jade
Height 9 cm (32 in)
The most unusual feature of this axe--the strongly crescentic butt--indicates that the piece was fashioned from the section of a large disk, with the butt retaining the shape of the disk's central perforation, while the sharpened cutting edge has been reshaped from its outer perimeter. The piece is not, however, a true disk axe, which, by definition, would be formed from a complete disk. [1] Symmetrically arranged low notches on the flaring lateral sides are less sharply articulated on one side of the axe than on the other. A small, biconical hole appears at the top center. The axe has been broken into two parts along a jagged diagonal line. The part seen on the upper left in the present photograph is faintly greenish in tone, while the larger fragment is uniformly cream colored, suggesting that the two pieces must have lain separate from one another in the ground.
Note:
[1] Max Loehr, Ancient Chinese Jades from the Grenville L. Winthrop Collection in the Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University (Cambridge, MA: Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University, 1975), nos. 22--23.
Usage conditions apply
There are restrictions for re-using this image. For more information, visit the Smithsonian's Terms of Use page.
The information presented on this website may be revised and updated at any time as ongoing research progresses or as otherwise warranted. Pending any such revisions and updates, information on this site may be incomplete or inaccurate or may contain typographical errors. Neither the Smithsonian nor its regents, officers, employees, or agents make any representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the information on the site. Use this site and the information provided on it subject to your own judgment. The National Museum of Asian Art welcomes information that would augment or clarify the ownership history of objects in their collections..